Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marlon Vankan vs Marcel Zielinski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vankan vs Zielinski analysis and find out who is favored!
Marlon Vankan vs Marcel Zielinski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Vankan 1 - 0 Zielinski
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vankan has won 46.25% of points on their second serve, while Zielinski has won 46.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vankan, in recent form, has won 51.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zielinski has won 47.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.43% and 35.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vankan has saved 56.06% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zielinski has saved 45.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vankan has won 57.58% of matches played (W/L 38/ 28), with Zielinski winning 44.9% (W/L 22/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vankan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 114/ 89), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17). Zielinski has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 61/ 45).
- Player level: In the last year, Vankan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.73% of matches (W/L 37/ 26), where as Zielinski has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.9% of matches (W/L 22/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vankan winning 1 times and Zielinski being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Vankan winning 2 and Zielinski winning 1. The last match between Vankan and Zielinski was at the M15 Eupen, 10-08-2022, First, Clay with Marlon Vankan getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vankan and Zielinski have played a deciding set 1 times, with Vankan winning 1 times and Zielinski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vankan winning 0, and Zielinski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vankan has played against opponents with an average rank of 167.05 while Zielinski has played against players with an average rank of 124.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vankan has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zielinski has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vankan has converted 42.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zielinski has converted 46.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
534
Rank
524
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
799
Rank
700
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
53% (127-112)
Career Total W/L
58% (68-49)
50% (12-12)
YTD W/L
25% (4-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marlon Vankan | Marcel Zielinski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:43:0 | 2:43:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (55/93) | 55% (58/105) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (36/55) | 62% (36/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (17/38) | 51% (24/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (6/14) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (45/105) | 43% (40/93) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Marlon Vankan
Player
Marcel Zielinski
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
105)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marlon Vankan | Marcel Zielinski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (12/12) | 25% (4/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (28/30) | 27% (9/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (253/272) | 40% (114/171) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (12/12) | 25% (4/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 28 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:58 | 1:32:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 125.88 | 164.44 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1169/1742) | 65% (623/961) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (728/1169) | 50% (312/623) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (265/573) | 46% (156/338) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (75/178) | 47% (47/101) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (672/1663) | 41% (359/876) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (11/11) | 25% (4/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (11/23) | 25% (4/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (14/10) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (14/4) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (12/0) |
Marlon Vankan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Marlon Vankan
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Marlon Vankan
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Faris Zakaryia
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Norbert Marosik
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Hrazdil
Player
Marlon Vankan
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Marlon Vankan
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Eero Vasa
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 3-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Artur Kukasian
67%
(
82 of
122)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
46%
(
56 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marcel Zielinski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Piotr Siekanowicz
Player
Marcel Zielinski
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
0
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
3
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
51%
(
51 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
54 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Marcel Zielinski
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Marcel Zielinski
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcel Zielinski
Player
Liviu Popirlan
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Marcel Zielinski
47%
(
17 of
36)
1st Serve %
78%
(
36 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcel Zielinski
Player
Kai Lemstra
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Marcel Zielinski
52%
(
15 of
29)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Pietri
Player
Marcel Zielinski
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
74%
(
26 of
35)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
46
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kane Bonsach Ganley
Player
Marcel Zielinski
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcel Zielinski
Player
Benjamin Pietri
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Vankan Vs Zielinski Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Vankan are available here and Zielinski photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
